Legislature(2017 - 2018)
2018-03-21 House Journal
No results found showing results without HB%20286
Full Journal pdf2018-03-21 House Journal Page 2823 Excused: Neuman And so, Amendment No. 63 was not adopted. The Speaker stated that, without objection, Amendment Nos. 64 and 65 would be moved to the bottom of the amendments. Amendment No. 66 was offered by Representatives Eastman and Rauscher: Page 53, following line 6: Insert a new subsection to read: "(c) It is the intent of the legislature that no state funds be used to promote the creation or expansion of a borough where one does not already exist unless the residents in the affected jurisdiction have expressed the desire to reside in a borough through a public vote on the matter." Representative Eastman moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 66 be adopted. Representative Guttenberg objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 66 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 286(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 66 YEAS: 9 NAYS: 30 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Chenault, Eastman, Johnson, Parish, Rauscher, Talerico, Thompson, Tilton, Wilson Nays: Birch, Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Foster, Gara, Grenn, Guttenberg, Johnston, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Knopp, Kopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Lincoln, Millett, Ortiz, Pruitt, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes, Sullivan-Leonard, Tarr, Tuck, Wool, Zulkosky Excused: Neuman And so, Amendment No. 66 was not adopted.