Legislature(2017 - 2018)
2017-05-13 House Journal
No results found showing results without HB%20%2074
Full Journal pdf2017-05-13 House Journal Page 1389 The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 5 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 74(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 5 YEAS: 14 NAYS: 20 EXCUSED: 6 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Eastman, Johnson, Kawasaki, LeDoux, Millett, Neuman, Parish, Pruitt, Rauscher, Reinbold, Saddler, Tilton, Tuck, Wilson Nays: Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fansler, Foster, Gara, Grenn, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kito, Kopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, Ortiz, Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes, Talerico, Tarr, Westlake, Wool Excused: Birch, Chenault, Johnston, Knopp, Sullivan-Leonard, Thompson And so, Amendment No. 5 was not adopted. Amendment No. 6 was offered by Representatives Tuck, Eastman, Kawasaki, Rauscher, Wilson, Pruitt, Johnson, and Reinbold: Page 3, lines 6 - 8: Delete all material and insert: "(2) may not copy, scan, or retain in any form a document other than the application." Page 6, lines 6 - 8: Delete all material and insert: "(2) may not copy, scan, or retain in any form a document other than the application." Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 6 be adopted. Representative Wool objected. Representative Millett placed a call of the House and lifted the call. Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent to withdraw Amendment No. 6. There being no objection, it was so ordered.