2017-03-06                     House Journal                      Page 0413
Millett, Neuman, Ortiz, Parish, Pruitt, Rauscher, Reinbold, Saddler,                                                            
Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Tarr,                                                                    
Thompson, Tilton, Tuck, Westlake, Wilson, Wool                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
And so, HB 48 passed the House.                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll                                                             
call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the                                                              
effective date clause.  There being no objection, it was so ordered.                                                            
                                                                                                                                
HB 48 was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
                       THIRD READING OF HOUSE BILLS                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
HB 8                                                                                                                          
The following, which was advanced to third reading from the March 1                                                             
calendar (page 372), was read the third time:                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
     HOUSE BILL NO. 8                                                                                                           
     "An Act relating to protective orders."                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Representative Wilson moved and asked unanimous consent that HB 8                                                               
be returned to second reading for the specific purpose of considering                                                           
Amendment No. 1.  There being no objection, it was so ordered.                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
Amendment No. 1 was offered  by Representatives Wilson and                                                                       
Reinbold:                                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
Page 4, following line 22:                                                                                                      
     Insert a new bill section to read:                                                                                         
"* Sec. 8. AS 22.35.030 is amended to read:                                                                                   
         Sec. 22.35.030. Publication of Records [RECORDS                                                                    
     CONCERNING CRIMINAL CASES RESULTING IN                                                                                   
     ACQUITTAL OR DISMISSAL]. The Alaska Court System may                                                                     
     not publish a court record [OF A CRIMINAL CASE] on a                                                                       
     publicly available website                                                                                                 
              (1)  in a criminal case if 60 days have elapsed from the                                                      
     date of acquittal or dismissal and                                                                                         
                  (A) [(1)]  the defendant was acquitted of all charges                                                     
         filed in the case;