2018-04-18                     House Journal                      Page 3358
and                                                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
     SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 275(FIN)                                                                               
     "An Act extending the termination date of the Board of Massage                                                             
     Therapists; and providing for an effective date."                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
     (SCR 22 - title change resolution)                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
There being no objection, it was so ordered.                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Representative Tuck moved that the House concur in the Senate                                                                   
amendment and recommended that the members vote yes.                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
The question being:  "Shall the House concur in the Senate                                                                      
amendment?"  The roll was taken with the following result:                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
SCS CSHB 275(FIN)                                                                                                               
Concur                                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
YEAS:  39   NAYS:  1   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  0                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
Yeas:  Birch, Chenault, Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Foster, Gara,                                                                 
Grenn, Guttenberg, Johnson, Johnston, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito,                                                                
Knopp, Kopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Lincoln, Millett, Neuman,                                                                  
Ortiz, Parish, Pruitt, Rauscher, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Spohnholz,                                                          
Stutes, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Tarr, Thompson, Tilton, Tuck,                                                               
Wilson, Wool, Zulkosky                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
Nays:  Eastman                                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
And so, the House concurred in the Senate amendment, thus adopting                                                              
SCS CSHB 275(FIN).                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll                                                             
call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the                                                              
effective date clause.  There being no objection, it was so ordered.                                                            
                                                                                                                                
The Chief Clerk notified the Senate.                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
The bill was referred to the Chief Clerk for enrollment.