Legislature(2015 - 2016)
2015-11-03 Senate Journal
Full Journal pdf2015-11-03 Senate Journal Page 1515 SB 3001 CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 3001(FIN) "An Act making supplemental appropriations; making appropriations to capitalize funds; and providing for an effective date" was read the third time. The question being: "Shall CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 3001(FIN) "An Act making supplemental appropriations; making appropriations to capitalize funds; and providing for an effective date" pass the Senate?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 3001(FIN) Third Reading - Final Passage Effective Date YEAS: 16 NAYS: 3 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Bishop, Coghill, Costello, Egan, Ellis, Gardner, Giessel, Hoffman, Kelly, MacKinnon, Meyer, Micciche, Olson, Stedman, Stevens, Wielechowski Nays: Dunleavy, Huggins, Stoltze Excused: McGuire and so, CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 3001(FIN) passed the Senate. 2015-11-03 Senate Journal Page 1516 Senator Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the vote on the passage of the bill be considered the vote on the effective date clause. Without objection, it was so ordered. SB 3001 Senator Coghill gave notice of reconsideration on CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 3001(FIN) and moved and asked unanimous consent that it be taken up. Without objection, it was so ordered and the bill was before the Senate on reconsideration. The question to be reconsidered: "Shall CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 3001(FIN) "An Act making supplemental appropriations; making appropriations to capitalize funds; and providing for an effective date" pass the Senate?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 3001(FIN) Third Reading - On Reconsideration Effective Date YEAS: 16 NAYS: 3 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 2015-11-03 Senate Journal Page 1517 Yeas: Bishop, Coghill, Costello, Egan, Ellis, Gardner, Giessel, Hoffman, Kelly, MacKinnon, Meyer, Micciche, Olson, Stedman, Stevens, Wielechowski Nays: Dunleavy, Huggins, Stoltze Excused: McGuire and so, CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 3001(FIN) passed the Senate on reconsideration. Senator Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the vote on reconsideration of the bill be considered the vote on the effective date clause. Without objection, it was so ordered and the bill was referred to the Secretary for engrossment.