Legislature(2015 - 2016)

2016-02-29 Senate Journal

No results found showing results without SB%20%2089

Full Journal pdf

2016-02-29                     Senate Journal                      Page 1993
CSSB 72(L&C)                                                                                                                    
Third Reading - On Reconsideration                                                                                              
Effective Date                                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
YEAS:  19   NAYS:  0   EXCUSED:  1   ABSENT:  0                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
Yeas:  Bishop, Coghill, Costello, Dunleavy, Egan, Ellis, Gardner,                                                               
Giessel, Hoffman, Huggins, Kelly, MacKinnon, McGuire, Meyer,                                                                    
Micciche, Olson, Stevens, Stoltze, Wielechowski                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
Excused:  Stedman                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
and so, CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 72(L&C) passed the Senate on                                                                     
reconsideration.                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
Senator Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the vote on                                                              
the passage of the bill be considered the vote on the effective date                                                            
clause. Without objection, it was so ordered and the bill was referred                                                          
to the Secretary for engrossment.                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
Senators Gardner, Stevens, Micciche, Bishop, Egan, MacKinnon,                                                                   
McGuire, Costello, Stoltze moved and asked unanimous consent to be                                                              
shown as cosponsors on the bill. Without objection, it was so ordered.                                                          
                                                                                                                                
SB 89                                                                                                                         
Senator Gardner requested that the reconsideration on CS FOR                                                                    
SENATE BILL NO. 89(RLS) am(efd add) be taken up. The bill was                                                                   
before the Senate on reconsideration.                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
The question to be reconsidered: "Shall CS FOR SENATE BILL                                                                      
NO. 89(RLS) am(efd add) "An Act relating to a parent's right to direct                                                          
the education of a child; prohibiting a school district from contracting                                                        
with an abortion services provider; prohibiting a school district from                                                          
allowing an abortion services provider to furnish course materials or                                                           
provide instruction concerning sexuality or sexually transmitted                                                                
diseases; relating to physical examinations for teachers; and providing                                                         
for an effective date" pass the Senate?" The roll was taken with the                                                            
following result: