Legislature(2015 - 2016)

2016-02-26 Senate Journal

No results found showing results without SB%20%2089

Full Journal pdf

2016-02-26                     Senate Journal                      Page 1967
CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 89(RLS) am(edf add) was automatically                                                                    
in third reading.                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
The question being: "Shall CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 89(RLS)                                                                       
am(edf add) "An Act relating to a parent's right to direct the education                                                        
of a child; prohibiting a school district from contracting with an                                                              
abortion services provider; prohibiting a school district from allowing                                                         
an abortion services provider to furnish course materials or provide                                                            
instruction concerning sexuality or sexually transmitted diseases;                                                              
relating to physical examinations for teachers; and providing for an                                                            
effective date" pass the Senate?" The roll was taken with the following                                                         
result:                                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
CSSB 89(RLS) am(efd add)                                                                                                        
Third Reading - Final Passage                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
YEAS:  11   NAYS:  7   EXCUSED:  1   ABSENT:  1                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
Yeas:  Coghill, Costello, Dunleavy, Giessel, Huggins, Kelly,                                                                    
MacKinnon, Meyer, Micciche, Olson, Stoltze                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
Nays:  Bishop, Egan, Ellis, Gardner, Hoffman, Stedman, Stevens                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
Excused:  Wielechowski                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
Absent:  McGuire                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
and so, CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 89(RLS) am(edf add) passed the                                                                   
Senate.                                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
Senator Coghill moved for the adoption of the effective date clause.                                                            
                                                                                                                                
The question being: "Shall the effective date clause be adopted?" The                                                           
roll was taken with the following result:                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
CSSB 89(RLS) am(efd add)                                                                                                        
Effective Date Clause                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
YEAS:  18   NAYS:  0   EXCUSED:  1   ABSENT:  1