Legislature(2013 - 2014)
2013-03-20 Senate Journal
No results found showing results without SB%20%2021
Full Journal pdf2013-03-20 Senate Journal Page 0710 Senator Wielechowski moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 6. Senator Coghill objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 6 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 21(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 6 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Ellis, French, Gardner, Hoffman, Wielechowski Nays: Bishop, Coghill, Dunleavy, Dyson, Egan, Fairclough, Giessel, Huggins, Kelly, McGuire, Meyer, Micciche, Olson, Stedman, Stevens and so, Amendment No. 6 failed. Senators French, Ellis, Wielechowski, Gardner offered Amendment No. 7 : Page 22, line 8: Delete "one or more" Insert "either or both" Page 22, lines 13 - 20: Delete "; (3) the oil or gas is produced from a well that has been accurately metered and measured by the operator to the satisfaction of the commissioner, and the producer demonstrates to the department that the metered well drains a reservoir or portion of a reservoir that the Department of Natural Resources has certified was not contributing to production before January 1, 2013, and the producer demonstrates to the department that the volume of oil or gas produced from the well was subject to certification by the Department of Natural Resources" Senator French moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 7. Senator Coghill objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 7 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: