Legislature(2011 - 2012)
2011-04-16 House Journal
No results found showing results without SCR%2014
Full Journal pdf2011-04-16 House Journal Page 1061 Representative Austerman moved that the House concur in the Senate amendment to CSHB 127(FIN), thus adopting SCS CSHB 127(JUD), and recommended that the members vote yes. The question being: "Shall the House concur in the Senate amendment to CSHB 127(FIN)?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 127(JUD) Concur YEAS: 40 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Austerman, Chenault, Cissna, Costello, Dick, Doogan, Edgmon, Fairclough, Feige, Foster, Gara, Gardner, Gatto, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Hawker, Herron, Holmes, Johansen, Johnson, Joule, Kawasaki, Keller, Kerttula, Lynn, Miller, Millett, Munoz, Neuman, Olson, Petersen, Pruitt, Saddler, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas, Thompson, Tuck, P.Wilson, T.Wilson And so, the House concurred in the Senate amendment. Representative Austerman moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the court rule changes. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Austerman moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. The Chief Clerk notified the Senate. SCS CSHB 127(JUD) was referred to the Chief Clerk for enrollment. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS SCR 14 Representative Austerman moved and asked unanimous consent that the following be taken up as a Special Order of Business: