2012-03-26                     House Journal                      Page 2019
The question to be reconsidered:  "Shall CSHB 264(CRA) pass the                                                                 
House?"  The roll was taken with the following result:                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
CSHB 264(CRA)                                                                                                                   
Third Reading                                                                                                                   
Final Passage                                                                                                                   
Reconsideration                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
YEAS:  36   NAYS:  1   EXCUSED:  1   ABSENT:  2                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
Yeas:  Austerman, Chenault, Cissna, Costello, Dick, Doogan,                                                                     
Edgmon, Fairclough, Feige, Foster, Gara, Gardner, Gruenberg,                                                                    
Guttenberg, Hawker, Herron, Holmes, Johansen, Johnson, Kawasaki,                                                                
Keller, Kerttula, Lynn, Miller, Millett, Munoz, Neuman, Olson,                                                                  
Petersen, Pruitt, Saddler, Seaton, Stoltze, Thompson, Tuck, P.Wilson                                                            
                                                                                                                                
Nays:  T.Wilson                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
Excused:  Gatto                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
Absent:  Joule, Thomas                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
And so, CSHB 264(CRA) passed the House on reconsideration.                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
Representative Austerman moved and asked unanimous consent that                                                                 
the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the                                                     
effective date clause.  There being no objection, it was so ordered.                                                            
                                                                                                                                
CSHB 264(CRA) was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
SB 86                                                                                                                         
Representative Kerttula brought up reconsideration of the vote on                                                               
CSSB 86(JUD)(efd am) (page 1992).                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
The following was again before the House in third reading:                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
     CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 86(JUD)(efd am)                                                                                     
     "An Act relating to the protection of property of persons under                                                            
     disability and minors; relating to the crime of violating a                                                                
     protective order concerning certain vulnerable persons; relating to                                                        
     aggravating factors at sentencing for offenses concerning a victim