Legislature(2011 - 2012)
2012-02-27 House Journal
No results found showing results without HB%20279
Full Journal pdf2012-02-27 House Journal Page 1714 Representative Austerman moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 279(FIN) (same title) There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Austerman moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 279(FIN) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 279(FIN) was read the third time. The question being: "Shall CSHB 279(FIN) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 279(FIN) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 36 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 4 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Austerman, Chenault, Costello, Dick, Doogan, Edgmon, Fairclough, Feige, Foster, Gara, Gardner, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Hawker, Herron, Johansen, Johnson, Joule, Kawasaki, Keller, Kerttula, Lynn, Miller, Millett, Munoz, Olson, Petersen, Pruitt, Saddler, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas, Thompson, Tuck, P.Wilson, T.Wilson Excused: Cissna, Gatto, Holmes, Neuman And so, CSHB 279(FIN) passed the House. Representative Austerman moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 279(FIN) was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.