Legislature(2011 - 2012)
2011-03-31 House Journal
No results found showing results without HB%20110
Full Journal pdf2011-03-31 House Journal Page 0689 The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 4 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 110(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 4 YEAS: 11 NAYS: 27 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Doogan, Gara, Gardner, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Holmes, Kawasaki, Kerttula, Miller, Petersen, Tuck Nays: Austerman, Chenault, Costello, Dick, Edgmon, Fairclough, Feige, Foster, Gatto, Hawker, Herron, Johansen, Johnson, Joule, Keller, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Olson, Pruitt, Saddler, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas, Thompson, P.Wilson, T.Wilson Excused: Cissna, Neuman And so, Amendment No. 4 was not adopted. Amendment No. 5 was offered by Representative Gara: Page 1, lines 1 - 8 (title amendment): Delete all material and insert: ""An Act providing for a tax credit applicable to the oil and gas production tax based on capital expenditures for a production facility for new oil and gas production; and providing for an effective date."" Page 1, line 10, through page 20, line 26: Delete all material and insert: "* Section 1. AS 43.20.043(g) is amended to read: (g) A taxpayer that obtains a credit for a qualified capital investment or cost incurred for qualified services under this section may not also claim a tax credit or royalty modification for the same qualified capital investment or cost incurred for qualified services under AS 38.05.180(i), AS 41.09.010, AS 43.55.023, [OR] 43.55.025, or 43.55.026. However, a taxpayer may elect not to obtain a credit under this section in order to qualify for a credit provided under AS 38.05.180(i), AS 41.09.010, AS 43.55.023, [OR] 43.55.025, or 43.55.026. * Sec. 2. AS 43.55.023(a) is amended to read: