Legislature(2011 - 2012)
2012-03-26 House JournalFull Journal pdf
2012-03-26 House Journal Page 2018 HB 264 Representative Kerttula brought up reconsideration of the vote on CSHB 264(CRA) (page 1990). The following was again before the House in third reading: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 264(CRA) "An Act allowing a deferral of municipal property taxes on the increase in the value of real property attributable to subdivision of that property; and providing for an effective date." 2012-03-26 House Journal Page 2019 The question to be reconsidered: "Shall CSHB 264(CRA) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 264(CRA) Third Reading Final Passage Reconsideration YEAS: 36 NAYS: 1 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Austerman, Chenault, Cissna, Costello, Dick, Doogan, Edgmon, Fairclough, Feige, Foster, Gara, Gardner, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Hawker, Herron, Holmes, Johansen, Johnson, Kawasaki, Keller, Kerttula, Lynn, Miller, Millett, Munoz, Neuman, Olson, Petersen, Pruitt, Saddler, Seaton, Stoltze, Thompson, Tuck, P.Wilson Nays: T.Wilson Excused: Gatto Absent: Joule, Thomas And so, CSHB 264(CRA) passed the House on reconsideration. Representative Austerman moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 264(CRA) was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.