2009-04-02                     House Journal                      Page 0702
Nays:  Kawasaki, Kerttula                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
Excused:  Austerman, Cissna, Foster, Petersen                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Absent:  Gara, Herron                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
And so, CSHB 134(RES) passed the House.                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
Representative Johansen moved and asked unanimous consent that the                                                              
roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the                                                         
effective date clause.  There being no objection, it was so ordered.                                                            
                                                                                                                                
CSHB 134(RES) was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
HB 156                                                                                                                        
The following, which was advanced to third reading from the April 1,                                                            
2009, calendar (page 673), was read the third time:                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
    HOUSE BILL NO. 156                                                                                                          
    "An Act relating to municipal fees charged for disposal of waste                                                            
    material from the substantial rehabilitation, renovation,                                                                   
    demolition, removal, or replacement of a structure on deteriorated                                                          
    property."                                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
Representative Gara moved and asked unanimous consent that HB 156                                                               
be returned to second reading for the specific purpose of considering                                                           
Amendment No. 1.  There being no objection, it was so ordered.                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
Amendment No. 1 was offered  by Representative Gara:                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
Page 2, line 3, following "in the ordinance.":                                                                                  
 Insert "An ordinance may limit the exemption as it applies to                                                                  
deteriorated property to those eligible properties for which the                                                                
exemption is needed to make the project economically feasible as that                                                           
term is defined in the ordinance adopted under this subsection."                                                                
                                                                                                                                
Representative Gara moved and asked unanimous consent that                                                                      
Amendment No. 1 be adopted.                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
Representative Lynn objected.