Legislature(2007 - 2008)
2008-02-06 House JournalFull Journal pdf
2008-02-06 House Journal Page 1887 HB 260 The following was read the second time: HOUSE BILL NO. 260 "An Act relating to a State Officers Compensation Commission and establishing how legislators, the governor, the lieutenant governor, and executive department heads shall be compensated; providing for an effective date by repealing the effective dates of certain sections of ch. 124, SLA 1986; and providing for an effective date." with the: Journal Page STA RPT CS(STA) 1DP 3NR 2AM 1760 FN1: (ADM) 1760 FIN RPT CS(STA) 2DP 2DNP 4NR 1AM 1845 FN1: (ADM) 1846 Representative Samuels moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 260(STA) (same title) There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Samuels moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 260(STA) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 260(STA) was read the third time. The question being: "Shall CSHB 260(STA) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: 2008-02-06 House Journal Page 1888 CSHB 260(STA) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 28 NAYS: 7 EXCUSED: 5 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Buch, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Dahlstrom, Doll, Doogan, Edgmon, Fairclough, Gara, Gardner, Gatto, Guttenberg, Harris, Holmes, Johansen, Johnson, Joule, Kawasaki, Kerttula, LeDoux, Meyer, Nelson, Olson, Salmon, Samuels, Seaton, Thomas Nays: Chenault, Hawker, Keller, Kelly, Neuman, Ramras, Stoltze Excused: Foster, Gruenberg, Lynn, Roses, Wilson And so, CSHB 260(STA) passed the House. Representative Samuels moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Stoltze gave notice of reconsideration of the vote on CSHB 260(STA).