Legislature(2005 - 2006)
2006-05-09 Senate JournalFull Journal pdf
2006-05-09 Senate Journal Page 3376 SB 305 Senator Gary Stevens moved that the Senate rescind its previous action in failing to concur (page 3367) in the House amendments to CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 305(FIN) am; namely, HOUSE CS FOR CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 305(FIN) am H "An Act repealing the oil production tax and the gas production tax and providing for a production tax on oil and gas; relating to the calculation of the gross value at the point of production of oil and gas and to the determination of the value of oil and gas for purposes of the production tax on oil and gas; providing for tax credits against the production tax on oil and gas; relating to the relationship of the production tax on oil and gas to other taxes, to the dates those tax payments and surcharges are due, to interest on overpayments of the tax, and to the treatment of the tax in a producer's settlement with the royalty owners; relating to flared gas, and to oil and gas used in the operation of a lease or property under the production tax; relating to the prevailing value of oil and gas under the production tax; relating to 2006-05-09 Senate Journal Page 3377 surcharges on oil; relating to statements or other information required to be filed with or furnished to the Department of Revenue, to the penalty for failure to file certain reports for the tax, to the powers of the Department of Revenue, and to the disclosure of certain information required to be furnished to the Department of Revenue as applicable to the administration of the tax; relating to criminal penalties for violating conditions governing access to and use of confidential information relating to the tax, and to the deposit of tax money collected by the Department of Revenue; amending the definitions of 'gas,' 'oil,' and certain other terms for purposes of the production tax, and as the definition of the term 'gas' applies in the Alaska Stranded Gas Development Act, and adding further definitions; making conforming amendments; and providing for an effective date." The question being: "Shall the Senate rescind its previous action in failing to concur in the House amendments?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 305(FIN) am H Rescind action in failing to concur in the House Amendments to CSSB 305(FIN) am? YEAS: 9 NAYS: 11 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Cowdery, Green, Hoffman, Huggins, Kookesh, Olson, Stedman, Stevens B, Stevens G Nays: Bunde, Davis, Dyson, Ellis, Elton, French, Guess, Seekins, Therriault, Wagoner, Wilken and so, the Senate failed to rescind its previous action.