Legislature(2005 - 2006)
2006-06-07 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2006-06-07 House Journal Page 4169 SB 2002 Representative Kott brought up reconsideration of the vote on HCS CSSB 2002(JUD) am H (page 4161). 2006-06-07 House Journal Page 4170 The following was again before the House in third reading: HOUSE CS FOR CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 2002(JUD) am H "An Act increasing the time period for legislative and public comment on a proposed contract and preliminary findings and determinations under the Alaska Stranded Gas Development Act, conferring original jurisdiction on the Alaska Supreme Court for the purpose of providing judicial review of a contract executed under the Alaska Stranded Gas Development Act, and setting the time in which a final agency decision of the commissioner of revenue made under that Act, the constitutionality of a law authorizing a contract enacted under that Act, or the enforceability of a contract executed under a law authorizing a contract enacted under that Act must be legally challenged and by whom; and providing for an effective date." Representative Berkowitz moved and asked unanimous consent that reconsideration of HCS CSSB 2002(JUD) am H be tabled. There was objection. **The presence of Representative Kohring was noted. The question being: "Shall the reconsideration of HCS CSSB 2002(JUD) am H be tabled?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 2002(JUD) am H--RECONSIDERATION Third Reading Reconsideration - Table YEAS: 11 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 3 Yeas: Berkowitz, Cissna, Crawford, Dahlstrom, Gara, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Kapsner, Kerttula, Moses, Salmon Nays: Anderson, Chenault, Coghill, Elkins, Gatto, Harris, Hawker, Holm, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, LeDoux, Lynn, McGuire, Meyer, Neuman, Olson, Ramras, Rokeberg, Samuels, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas, Wilson Excused: Foster, Weyhrauch 2006-06-07 House Journal Page 4171 Absent: Croft, Gardner, Joule And so, the motion failed. **The presence of Representative Joule was noted. Representative Kott moved and asked unanimous consent that the House return to second reading to rescind action in adopting Amendment No. 1. There being no objection, it was so ordered. The Speaker stated that, without objection, HCS CSSB 2002(JUD) am H would be returned to second reading for all amendments. Representative Kott moved and asked unanimous consent that the House rescind previous action in adopting Amendment No. 1. There was objection. **The presence of Representative Gardner was noted. The question being: "Shall the House rescind previous action in adopting Amendment No. 1?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 2002(JUD) am H--RECONSIDERATION Second Reading Rescind Previous Action/Adopting Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 14 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Anderson, Chenault, Coghill, Harris, Hawker, Kohring, Kott, McGuire, Meyer, Olson, Rokeberg, Samuels, Thomas, Wilson Nays: Berkowitz, Cissna, Crawford, Croft, Dahlstrom, Elkins, Gara, Gardner, Gatto, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Holm, Joule, Kapsner, Kelly, Kerttula, LeDoux, Lynn, Moses, Neuman, Ramras, Salmon, Seaton, Stoltze Excused: Foster, Weyhrauch And so, the motion failed. 2006-06-07 House Journal Page 4172 Amendment No. 3 was offered by Representative Gruenberg: Page 2, line 4: Delete "60" Insert "120" Representative Gruenberg moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 3 be adopted. Representative Coghill objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 3 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 2002(JUD) am H--RECONSIDERATION Second Reading Amendment No. 3 YEAS: 19 NAYS: 19 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Berkowitz, Cissna, Crawford, Croft, Dahlstrom, Gara, Gardner, Gatto, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Harris, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, LeDoux, Moses, Ramras, Salmon, Thomas Nays: Anderson, Chenault, Coghill, Elkins, Hawker, Holm, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Lynn, McGuire, Meyer, Neuman, Olson, Rokeberg, Samuels, Seaton, Stoltze, Wilson Excused: Foster, Weyhrauch And so, Amendment No. 3 was not adopted. Amendment No. 4 was offered by Representatives Kerttula and Croft: Page 2, line 4: Delete "60" Insert "90" Representative Kerttula moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 4 be adopted. There was objection. 2006-06-07 House Journal Page 4173 The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 4 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 2002(JUD) am H--RECONSIDERATION Second Reading Amendment No. 4 YEAS: 28 NAYS: 10 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Anderson, Berkowitz, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Croft, Dahlstrom, Elkins, Gara, Gardner, Gatto, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Harris, Joule, Kapsner, Kelly, Kerttula, LeDoux, McGuire, Moses, Ramras, Rokeberg, Salmon, Samuels, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas Nays: Chenault, Hawker, Holm, Kohring, Kott, Lynn, Meyer, Neuman, Olson, Wilson Excused: Foster, Weyhrauch And so, Amendment No. 4 was adopted. HCS CSSB 2002(JUD) am H was automatically in third reading. The question to be reconsidered: "Shall HCS CSSB 2002(JUD) am H pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 2002(JUD) am H--RECONSIDERATION Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 36 NAYS: 2 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Anderson, Berkowitz, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Croft, Dahlstrom, Elkins, Gara, Gardner, Gatto, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Harris, Holm, Joule, Kapsner, Kelly, Kerttula, Kohring, Kott, LeDoux, Lynn, McGuire, Meyer, Moses, Neuman, Olson, Ramras, Rokeberg, Salmon, Samuels, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas, Wilson Nays: Chenault, Hawker Excused: Foster, Weyhrauch And so, HCS CSSB 2002(JUD) am H passed the House on reconsideration. 2006-06-07 House Journal Page 4174 Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. HCS CSSB 2002(JUD) am H was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.