2005-05-07                     House Journal                      Page 1707
Yeas:  Berkowitz, Cissna, Crawford, Gara, Gatto, Joule, Kapsner,                                    
Kerttula, Thomas, Weyhrauch                                                                         
                                                                                                    
Nays:  Anderson, Chenault, Coghill, Croft, Dahlstrom, Elkins, Foster,                               
Gardner, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Harris, Hawker, Holm, Kelly,                                        
Kohring, Kott, LeDoux, Lynn, McGuire, Meyer, Neuman, Olson,                                         
Ramras, Rokeberg, Samuels, Seaton, Stoltze, Wilson                                                  
                                                                                                    
Absent:  Moses, Salmon                                                                              
                                                                                                    
And so, Amendment No. 1 was not adopted.                                                            
                                                                                                    
                                                                                                    
Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that HCS                                   
CSSB 104(JUD) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading,                                   
and placed on final passage.  There being no objection, it was so                                   
ordered.                                                                                            
                                                                                                    
HCS CSSB 104(JUD) was read the third time.                                                          
                                                                                                    
The question being:  "Shall HCS CSSB 104(JUD) pass the House?"                                      
The roll was taken with the following result:                                                       
                                                                                                    
HCS CSSB 104(JUD)                                                                                   
Third Reading                                                                                       
Final Passage                                                                                       
                                                                                                    
YEAS:  39   NAYS:  0   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  1                                                   
                                                                                                    
Yeas:  Anderson, Berkowitz, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford,                                    
Croft, Dahlstrom, Elkins, Foster, Gara, Gardner, Gatto, Gruenberg,                                  
Guttenberg, Harris, Hawker, Holm, Joule, Kapsner, Kelly, Kerttula,                                  
Kohring, Kott, LeDoux, Lynn, McGuire, Meyer, Neuman, Olson,                                         
Ramras, Rokeberg, Salmon, Samuels, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas,                                         
Weyhrauch, Wilson                                                                                   
                                                                                                    
Absent:  Moses                                                                                      
                                                                                                    
And so, HCS CSSB 104(JUD) passed the House.                                                         
                                                                                                    
Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the                                   
roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the                             
effective date clause.  There being no objection, it was so ordered.