Legislature(2005 - 2006)
2005-03-21 House Journal
No results found showing results without SB%20%2042
Full Journal pdf2005-03-21 House Journal Page 0693 Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that SB 42 be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. SB 42 was read the third time. The question being: "Shall SB 42 pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: SB 42 Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 38 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Anderson, Berkowitz, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Croft, Dahlstrom, Elkins, Foster, Gara, Gardner, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Harris, Hawker, Holm, Joule, Kapsner, Kelly, Kerttula, Kohring, Kott, LeDoux, Lynn, McGuire, Meyer, Moses, Neuman, Olson, Ramras, Salmon, Samuels, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas, Weyhrauch, Wilson Absent: Gatto, Rokeberg And so, SB 42 passed the House. Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. SB 42 was signed by the Speaker and Chief Clerk and returned to the Senate. The Speaker stated that, without objection, the House would revert to: MESSAGES FROM THE SENATE SB 98 A message dated March 21, 2005, was read stating the Senate has failed to concur in the House amendment to: