2005-05-05                     House Journal                      Page 1616
                                                                                                    
CSHB 275(FIN) am--RECONSIDERATION                                                                   
Third Reading                                                                                       
Final Passage                                                                                       
                                                                                                    
YEAS:  31   NAYS:  4   EXCUSED:  2   ABSENT:  3                                                   
                                                                                                    
Yeas:  Anderson, Berkowitz, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford,                                    
Croft, Dahlstrom, Elkins, Foster, Gara, Gardner, Gatto, Gruenberg,                                  
Guttenberg, Harris, Hawker, Joule, Kapsner, Kohring, Kott, LeDoux,                                  
Lynn, Meyer, Moses, Neuman, Rokeberg, Salmon, Samuels, Seaton,                                      
Wilson                                                                                              
                                                                                                    
Nays:  Holm, Olson, Ramras, Stoltze                                                                 
                                                                                                    
Excused:  Kerttula, Thomas                                                                          
                                                                                                    
Absent:  Kelly, McGuire, Weyhrauch                                                                  
                                                                                                    
And so, CSHB 275(FIN) am passed the House on reconsideration.                                       
                                                                                                    
Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the                                   
roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the                             
effective date clause.  There being no objection, it was so ordered.                                
                                                                                                    
CSHB 275(FIN) am was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.                                   
                                                                                                    
                                                                                                    
                       THIRD READING OF SENATE BILLS                                             
                                                                                                    
SB 67                                                                                             
The following, which was advanced to third reading from the May 4,                                  
2005, calendar (page 1559), was read the third time:                                                
                                                                                                    
     HOUSE CS FOR CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 67(FIN)                                                    
     "An Act relating to claims for personal injury or wrongful death                               
     against health care providers."                                                                
                                                                                                    
Representative Weyhrauch moved and asked unanimous consent that                                     
HCS CSSB 67(FIN) be returned to second reading for the specific                                     
purpose of considering Amendment No. 1.  There being no objection,                                  
it was so ordered.