Legislature(2005 - 2006)
2005-05-05 House Journal
No results found showing results without HB%20275
Full Journal pdf2005-05-05 House Journal Page 1615 (d) The state bond committee may contract for credit enhancement, underwriting, credit ratings, bond counsel, financial advisor, printing, and trustee services that the committee considers necessary in financing the projects described in sec. 1 of this Act. (e) There is created the 2005 state transportation project fund. The proceeds of the revenue obligations issued under this Act shall be deposited into the 2005 state transportation project fund. (f) In this section, (1) "costs of construction" includes credit enhancement and underwriting expenses, rating agency fees, bond counsel fees, financial advisor fees, printing fees, trustee fees, and interest earnings used for lease payments; (2) "revenue obligation" means a certificate of participation in the right to receive a payment under a lease-financing agreement made to finance the costs of construction or acquisition of a state transportation project. * Sec. 5. The uncodified law of the State of Alaska is amended by adding a new section to read: NOTICE AND APPROVAL OF AGREEMENTS. Section 4 of this Act constitutes the notice and approval of lease-financing agreements to finance the transportation projects described in sec. 1 of this Act that is required by AS 36.30.085. * Sec. 6. The uncodified law of the State of Alaska is amended by adding a new section to read: STATE TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS IN METROPOLITAN PLANNING AREAS. If an amount allocated in sec. 1 of this Act for a state transportation project in a metropolitan planning area is not sufficient to complete the project, it is the intent of the legislature that the metropolitan planning organization for the metropolitan planning area include the project in the organization's transportation improvement program and fund the project to completion. * Sec. 7. This Act takes effect July 1, 2005." Representative Meyer moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 6 be adopted. There being no objection, it was so ordered. The question to be reconsidered: "Shall CSHB 275(FIN) am pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: