Legislature(2005 - 2006)

2005-04-28 House Journal

No results found showing results without HB%20%2071

Full Journal pdf

2005-04-28                     House Journal                      Page 1333
                                                                                                    
CSHB 92(JUD)                                                                                        
Third Reading                                                                                       
Final Passage                                                                                       
                                                                                                    
YEAS:  36   NAYS:  0   EXCUSED:  1   ABSENT:  3                                                   
                                                                                                    
Yeas:  Berkowitz, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Dahlstrom,                                   
Elkins, Foster, Gara, Gardner, Gatto, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Harris,                                
Hawker, Holm, Joule, Kapsner, Kelly, Kerttula, Kohring, Kott,                                       
LeDoux, Lynn, McGuire, Meyer, Moses, Neuman, Olson, Rokeberg,                                       
Salmon, Samuels, Seaton, Thomas, Weyhrauch, Wilson                                                  
                                                                                                    
Excused:  Stoltze                                                                                   
                                                                                                    
Absent:  Anderson, Croft, Ramras                                                                    
                                                                                                    
And so, CSHB 92(JUD) passed the House and was referred to the                                       
Chief Clerk for engrossment.                                                                        
                                                                                                    
                             RECONSIDERATION                                                     
                                                                                                    
HB 71                                                                                             
Representative Samuels brought up reconsideration of the vote on                                    
CSHB 71(FIN) (page 1231).                                                                           
                                                                                                    
The following, which had been held on reconsideration (page 1311),                                  
was again before the House in third reading:                                                        
                                                                                                    
     CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 71(FIN)                                                                  
     "An Act extending and amending the requirements applicable to                                  
     the credit that may be claimed for certain oil and gas exploration                             
     expenses incurred in Cook Inlet against oil and gas properties                                 
     production (severance) taxes, and amending the credit against                                  
     those taxes for certain exploration expenditures from leases or                                
     properties in the state; and providing for an effective date."                                 
                                                                                                    
Representative Samuels moved and asked unanimous consent that                                       
CSHB 71(FIN) be returned to second reading for the specific purpose                                 
of considering Amendment No. 1.  There being no objection, it was so                                
ordered.                                                                                            
                                                                                                    
Amendment No. 1 was offered  by Representative Samuels: