2006-05-06                     House Journal                      Page 3733
There being no objection, it was so ordered.                                                        
                                                                                                    
                                                                                                    
Representative Coghill moved that the House concur in the Senate                                    
amendment to CSHB 441(FIN), thus adopting SCS CSHB 441(FIN),                                        
and recommended that the members vote yes.                                                          
                                                                                                    
                                                                                                    
The question being:  "Shall the House concur in the Senate                                          
amendment to CSHB 441(FIN)?"  The roll was taken with the                                           
following result:                                                                                   
                                                                                                    
SCS CSHB 441(FIN)                                                                                   
Concur                                                                                              
                                                                                                    
YEAS:  40   NAYS:  0   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  0                                                   
                                                                                                    
Yeas:  Anderson, Berkowitz, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford,                                    
Croft, Dahlstrom, Elkins, Foster, Gara, Gardner, Gatto, Gruenberg,                                  
Guttenberg, Harris, Hawker, Holm, Joule, Kapsner, Kelly, Kerttula,                                  
Kohring, Kott, LeDoux, Lynn, McGuire, Meyer, Moses, Neuman,                                         
Olson, Ramras, Rokeberg, Salmon, Samuels, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas,                                  
Weyhrauch, Wilson                                                                                   
                                                                                                    
And so, the House concurred in the Senate amendment, thus adopting                                  
SCS CSHB 441(FIN).                                                                                  
                                                                                                    
                                                                                                    
Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the                                   
roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the                             
effective date clause.  There being no objection, it was so ordered.                                
                                                                                                    
Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the                                   
roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the                             
court rule change.  There being no objection, it was so ordered.                                    
                                                                                                    
                                                                                                    
The Chief Clerk notified the Senate.                                                                
                                                                                                    
SCS CSHB 441(FIN) was referred to the Chief Clerk for enrollment.