2004-05-11                     House Journal                      Page 4226
SB 179                                                                                            
Representative Rokeberg brought up reconsideration of the vote on                                   
CSSB179(FIN) (page 4156).                                                                           
                                                                                                    
The following was again before the House in third reading:                                          
                                                                                                    
     CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 179(FIN)                                                                
     "An Act relating to criminal history records and background                                    
     checks; allowing persons to teach in the public schools for up to                              
     five months without a teaching certificate if the person has applied                           
     for a certificate and the application has not been acted upon by the                           
     Department of Education and Early Development due to a delay in                                
     receiving criminal history records; allowing teacher certification                             
     for certain persons based on a criminal history background check                               
     without fingerprints; and providing for an effective date."                                    
                                                                                                    
The question to be reconsidered:  "Shall CSSB179(FIN) pass the                                      
House?"  The roll was taken with the following result:                                              
                                                                                                    
CSSB 179(FIN)--RECONSIDERATION                                                                      
Third Reading                                                                                       
Final Passage                                                                                       
                                                                                                    
YEAS:  28   NAYS:  6   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  6                                                   
                                                                                                    
Yeas:  Chenault, Crawford, Croft, Dahlstrom, Fate, Foster, Gatto,                                   
Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Harris, Holm, Joule, Kapsner, Kookesh, Kott,                                 
Lynn, Masek, Meyer, Morgan, Moses, Ogg, Rokeberg, Seaton,                                           
Stepovich, Stoltze, Williams, Wilson, Wolf                                                          
                                                                                                    
Nays:  Berkowitz, Coghill, Hawker, Kerttula, Kohring, Samuels                                       
                                                                                                    
Absent:  Anderson, Cissna, Gara, Heinze, McGuire, Weyhrauch                                         
                                                                                                    
Kohring changed from "Yea" to "Nay".                                                                
                                                                                                    
And so, CSSB179(FIN) passed the House on reconsideration.                                           
                                                                                                    
                                                                                                    
Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the                                   
roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the                             
effective date clause.  There being no objection, it was so ordered.