Legislature(2003 - 2004)
2003-05-14 House Journal
No results found showing results without SB%20%2089
Full Journal pdf2003-05-14 House Journal Page 1643 The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 89(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 2 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 25 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Berkowitz, Cissna, Crawford, Gara, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Kapsner, Kerttula, Kookesh, Lynn, Moses, Seaton, Weyhrauch Nays: Anderson, Chenault, Coghill, Dahlstrom, Fate, Foster, Gatto, Harris, Hawker, Heinze, Holm, Kohring, Kott, Masek, McGuire, Meyer, Morgan, Ogg, Rokeberg, Samuels, Stoltze, Whitaker, Williams, Wilson, Wolf Excused: Croft, Joule And so, Amendment No. 2 was not adopted. Amendment No. 3 was offered by Representative Gara: Page 4, lines 14 - 15: Delete all material and insert: "(ii) during the greater of either part of two calendar days in any month; or more than 12 hours in any calendar month;" Representative Gara moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 3 be adopted. Representative McGuire objected. Representative Coghill placed a call of the House on the bill. The Speaker stated the call was satisfied. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 3 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: