Legislature(2003 - 2004)
2004-04-28 House Journal
No results found showing results without HB%20298
Full Journal pdf2004-04-28 House Journal Page 3590 Nays: Anderson, Chenault, Coghill, Dahlstrom, Fate, Foster, Gatto, Harris, Hawker, Heinze, Holm, Kott, Lynn, McGuire, Meyer, Ogg, Rokeberg, Samuels, Seaton, Stepovich, Stoltze, Weyhrauch, Williams Excused: Kapsner And so, Amendment No. 2 to Amendment No. 3 was not adopted. Amendment No. 3 to Amendment No. 3 was offered by Representative Seaton: Delete "$1,111" Insert $1,100" Representative Seaton moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 3 be adopted. Representative Lynn objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 3 to Amendment No. 3 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 298(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 3 to Amendment No. 3 YEAS: 4 NAYS: 35 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Coghill, Fate, Meyer, Seaton Nays: Anderson, Berkowitz, Chenault, Cissna, Crawford, Croft, Dahlstrom, Foster, Gara, Gatto, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Harris, Hawker, Heinze, Holm, Joule, Kerttula, Kohring, Kookesh, Kott, Lynn, Masek, McGuire, Morgan, Moses, Ogg, Rokeberg, Samuels, Stepovich, Stoltze, Weyhrauch, Williams, Wilson, Wolf Excused: Kapsner Rokeberg changed from "Yea" to "Nay". Gruenberg changed from "Yea" to "Nay". Cissna changed from "Yea" to "Nay". Heinze changed from "Yea" to "Nay". And so, Amendment No. 3 to Amendment No. 3 was not adopted.