Legislature(2003 - 2004)
2003-05-18 House Journal
No results found showing results without HB%20260
Full Journal pdf2003-05-18 House Journal Page 1859 Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 260(JUD) (same title) There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 260(JUD) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 260(JUD) was read the third time. The question being: "Shall CSHB 260(JUD) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 260(JUD) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 31 NAYS: 4 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 3 Yeas: Anderson, Berkowitz, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Dahlstrom, Fate, Foster, Gara, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Harris, Hawker, Heinze, Holm, Kerttula, Kott, McGuire, Meyer, Morgan, Moses, Ogg, Rokeberg, Samuels, Seaton, Stoltze, Weyhrauch, Whitaker, Wilson, Wolf Nays: Gatto, Kohring, Lynn, Masek Excused: Croft, Joule Absent: Kapsner, Kookesh, Williams And so, CSHB 260(JUD) passed the House. Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered.