2003-05-18                     House Journal                      Page 1859
Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the                                   
following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill:                             
                                                                                                    
    CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 260(JUD)                                                                  
    (same title)                                                                                    
                                                                                                    
There being no objection, it was so ordered.                                                        
                                                                                                    
                                                                                                    
Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that                                       
CSHB 260(JUD) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading,                                   
and placed on final passage.  There being no objection, it was so                                   
ordered.                                                                                            
                                                                                                    
CSHB 260(JUD) was read the third time.                                                              
                                                                                                    
The question being:  "Shall CSHB 260(JUD) pass the House?"  The                                     
roll was taken with the following result:                                                           
                                                                                                    
CSHB 260(JUD)                                                                                       
Third Reading                                                                                       
Final Passage                                                                                       
                                                                                                    
YEAS:  31   NAYS:  4   EXCUSED:  2   ABSENT:  3                                                   
                                                                                                    
Yeas:  Anderson, Berkowitz, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford,                                    
Dahlstrom, Fate, Foster, Gara, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Harris,                                       
Hawker, Heinze, Holm, Kerttula, Kott, McGuire, Meyer, Morgan,                                       
Moses, Ogg, Rokeberg, Samuels, Seaton, Stoltze, Weyhrauch,                                          
Whitaker, Wilson, Wolf                                                                              
                                                                                                    
Nays:  Gatto, Kohring, Lynn, Masek                                                                  
                                                                                                    
Excused:  Croft, Joule                                                                              
                                                                                                    
Absent:  Kapsner, Kookesh, Williams                                                                 
                                                                                                    
And so, CSHB 260(JUD) passed the House.                                                             
                                                                                                    
Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the                                   
roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the                             
effective date clause.  There being no objection, it was so ordered.