Legislature(2001 - 2002)
2001-05-08 House JournalFull Journal pdf
2001-05-08 House Journal Page 1721 SB 105 Representative Croft brought up reconsideration of the vote on HCS CSSB 105(FIN) (page 1631). Representative Croft placed a call of the House and lifted the call. The following was again before the House in third reading: HOUSE CS FOR CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 105(FIN) "An Act relating to victims' rights; relating to establishing an office of victims' rights; relating to the crime victim's choice to appear or testify in a criminal case; relating to compensation of victims of violent crimes; relating to eligibility for a permanent fund dividend for persons convicted of and incarcerated for certain offenses; relating to notice of appropriations concerning victims' rights; relating to restitution for criminal and delinquency acts; authorizing the state to collect restitution on behalf of victims of crime and delinquent acts and the release of certain information related to that collection; relating to the forfeiture of certain cash and other security for payment of other restitution; relating to access by the Violent Crimes Compensation Board to certain records regarding delinquency acts to award compensation to victims; relating to immunity for damages related to certain collections of restitution; amending Rule 82, Alaska Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 16, Alaska Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 9, Alaska Delinquency Rules, and Rules 402 and 501, Alaska Rules of Evidence; and providing for an effective date." The question to be reconsidered: "Shall HCS CSSB 105(FIN) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: 2001-05-08 House Journal Page 1722 HCS CSSB 105(FIN)--RECONSIDERATION Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 36 NAYS: 1 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 3 Yeas: Bunde, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Croft, Davies, Dyson, Fate, Foster, Green, Guess, Halcro, Harris, Hayes, Hudson, James, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, Kohring, Kott, Lancaster, Masek, McGuire, Meyer, Morgan, Moses, Murkowski, Ogan, Porter, Rokeberg, Scalzi, Stevens, Whitaker, Wilson Nays: Mulder Absent: Berkowitz, Kookesh, Williams And so, HCS CSSB 105(FIN) passed the House on reconsideration. Representative James moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative James moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the court rule change. There being no objection, it was so ordered. HCS CSSB 105(FIN) was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.