2001-04-30                     House Journal                      Page 1409
Yeas:  Berkowitz, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Croft, Davies, Dyson,                                  
Fate, Guess, Halcro, Harris, Hayes, Hudson, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula,                               
Kookesh, Lancaster, McGuire, Meyer, Morgan, Murkowski, Stevens,                                     
Whitaker, Williams                                                                                  
                                                                                                    
Nays:  Chenault, Foster, Green, James, Kohring, Kott, Mulder, Ogan,                                 
Porter, Rokeberg, Scalzi, Wilson                                                                    
                                                                                                    
Excused:  Masek                                                                                     
                                                                                                    
Absent:  Bunde, Moses                                                                               
                                                                                                    
And so, Amendment No. 4 - Part B was adopted.                                                       
                                                                                                    
                                                                                                    
Representatives Murkowski and Rokeberg moved and asked                                              
unanimous consent that they be allowed to abstain from voting due to                                
a conflict of interest.  Objection was heard, and the members were                                  
required to vote.                                                                                   
                                                                                                    
The question being:  "Shall CSHB 106(L&C) am pass the House?"                                       
The roll was taken with the following result:                                                       
                                                                                                    
CSHB 106(L&C) am                                                                                    
Third Reading                                                                                       
Final Passage                                                                                       
                                                                                                    
YEAS:  37   NAYS:  2   EXCUSED:  1   ABSENT:  0                                                   
                                                                                                    
Yeas:  Berkowitz, Bunde, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Croft,                                
Davies, Dyson, Fate, Foster, Green, Guess, Halcro, Harris, Hayes,                                   
Hudson, James, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, Kookesh, Kott, Lancaster,                                  
McGuire, Meyer, Morgan, Moses, Mulder, Murkowski, Porter,                                           
Rokeberg, Scalzi, Stevens, Whitaker, Williams, Wilson                                               
                                                                                                    
Nays:  Kohring, Ogan                                                                                
                                                                                                    
Excused:  Masek                                                                                     
                                                                                                    
And so, CSHB 106(L&C) am passed the House.                                                          
                                                                                                    
Representative James moved and asked unanimous consent that the                                     
roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the                             
court rule change.  There being no objection, it was so ordered.