2000-04-24                     House Journal                      Page 3452
SB 4                                                                         
Representative Dyson moved and asked unanimous consent that he be              
allowed to abstain from voting due to a conflict of interest.  Objection       
was heard, and Representative Dyson was required to vote.                      
                                                                               
The question being:  "Shall HCS CSSB 4(FIN) pass the House?"  The              
roll was taken with the following result:                                      
                                                                               
HCS CSSB 4(FIN)                                                                
Third Reading                                                                  
Final Passage                                                                  
                                                                               
YEAS:  38   NAYS:  0   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  2                              
                                                                               
Yeas:  Austerman, Barnes, Berkowitz, Brice, Bunde, Cissna, Coghill,            
Cowdery, Davies, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Grussendorf, Halcro,             
Harris, Hudson, James, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kohring,             
Kookesh, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Moses, Mulder, Murkowski, Phillips,              
Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Smalley, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams             
                                                                               
Absent:  Croft, Ogan                                                           
                                                                               
And so, HCS CSSB 4(FIN) passed the House.                                      
                                                                               
Representative Green moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll           
call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the             
effective date clause.  There being no objection, it was so ordered.           
                                                                               
Representative Green moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll           
call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the court       
rule changes.  There being no objection, it was so ordered.                    
                                                                               
Representative Berkowitz gave notice of reconsideration of his vote on         
HCS CSSB 4(FIN).                                                               
                                                                               
                                                                               
SB 286                                                                       
The following, which was advanced to third reading from the April 21,          
2000, calendar (page 3413), was read the third time:                           
                                                                               
HOUSE CS FOR CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 286(FIN) am H                             
"An Act relating to the duties and powers of the attorney general."