1996-03-13                     House Journal                      Page 3128
HB 428                                                                       
Representative Finkelstein moved and asked unanimous consent that              
Amendment No. 6 be adopted.                                                    
                                                                               
Representative Mulder objected.                                                
                                                                               
The question being:  Shall Amendment No. 6 be adopted?  The roll               
was taken with the following result:                                           
                                                                               
CSHB 428(FIN) am                                                               
Second Reading                                                                 
Amendment No. 6                                                                
                                                                               
YEAS:  12   NAYS:  27   EXCUSED:  1   ABSENT:  0                             
                                                                               
Yeas:  Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf,         
Kubina, Mackie, Navarre, Robinson, Willis                                      
                                                                               
Nays:  Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley,               
Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Long, Martin, Masek, Moses,                 
Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault,        
Toohey, Vezey, Williams                                                        
                                                                               
Excused:  Nicholia                                                             
                                                                               
And so, Amendment No. 6 was not adopted.                                       
                                                                               
                                                                               
Amendment No. 7 was offered  by Representative Brown:                           
                                                                               
                                                                               
Page 3, line 27, after "contractor":                                           
	Insert "; for purposes of this subparagraph, the state is unable to           
contract when                                                                  
		(i)  there are no responses to an invitation to bid,                       
request for proposals, or other procurement notice for the                     
facility's operation;                                                          
		(ii)  there are no responsive bids received in response                    
to an invitation to bid for the facility's operation; or                       
		(iii)  the commissioner of corrections determines, for                     
reasonable cause, that it is not in the best interests of the state            
to have the facility operated by a third-party under contract."