Legislature(1995 - 1996)
1996-03-13 House Journal
No results found showing results without HB%20428
Full Journal pdf1996-03-13 House Journal Page 3119 HB 428 The question being: Shall the amendment to Amendment No. 2 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 428(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment to Amendment No. 2 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Long, Mackie, Navarre, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: B.Davis, Nicholia Absent: Masek, Ogan And so, the amendment to Amendment No. 2 was not adopted. Representative Toohey placed a call of the House. The call was satisfied. Objection to Amendment No. 2 was withdrawn. There being no further objection, Amendment No. 2 was adopted. Amendment No. 3 was offered by Representative Mulder: Page 3, line 22, following "capacity;": Insert a new paragraph to read: "(3) may not be constructed for operation by a third-party contractor under the authority given in this Act unless, before commencing construction planning, the commissioner of corrections first evaluates the proposed facility and the evaluation demonstrates that operation of the correctional facility described in (a) of this section will achieve a saving to the state of at least 10 percent when compared