Legislature(1993 - 1994)

1994-04-06 Senate Journal

No results found showing results without SB%20310

Full Journal pdf

1994-04-06                     Senate Journal                      Page 3487
SB 310                                                                       
The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 14 be adopted?"  The                  
roll was taken with the following result:                                      
                                                                               
CSSB 310(RES)                                                                  
Second Reading                                                                 
Amendment No. 14                                                               
                                                                               
YEAS:  8   NAYS:  12   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  0                              
                                                                               
Yeas:  Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff          
                                                                               
Nays:  Donley, Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce,            
Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor                                                
                                                                               
Kerttula changed from "Nay" to "Yea".                                          
                                                                               
and so, Amendment No. 14 failed.                                               
                                                                               
Senator Taylor moved and asked unanimous consent that CS FOR                   
SENATE BILL NO. 310(RES) be considered engrossed, advanced to                  
third reading and placed on final passage.                                     
                                                                               
Senator Adams objected.                                                        
                                                                               
The question being:  "Shall CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 310(RES)                    
be advanced to third reading?"  The roll was taken with the                    
following result:                                                              
                                                                               
CSSB 310(RES)                                                                  
Advance from Second to Third Reading?                                          
                                                                               
YEAS:  11   NAYS:  9   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  0                              
                                                                               
Yeas:  Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips,          
Rieger, Sharp, Taylor                                                          
                                                                               
Nays:  Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo,          
Zharoff                                                                        
                                                                               
and so, the bill failed to advance to third reading.