Legislature(1993 - 1994)
1994-02-07 House JournalFull Journal pdf
1994-02-07 House Journal Page 2282 HB 372 The following was read the second time: HOUSE BILL NO. 372 "An Act relating to the four dam pool transfer fund." with the: Journal Page 1994-02-07 House Journal Page 2283 HB 372 FIN RPT 6DP 1DNP 2NR 2237 -ZERO FISCAL NOTE (DCRA) 2/3/94 2237 Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representative Brown: Page 1, line 1, after "fund": (title amendment) Insert "and the Southeast energy fund" Page 1, line 3, after "Section 1.": Insert "AS42.45.040 is amended to read: Sec. 42.45.040. SOUTHEAST ENERGY FUND. The Southeast energy fund is established as a separate fund. The fund consists of money appropriated to it [TRANSFERRED TO IT UNDER AS42.45.050]. The department may make grants from the Southeast energy fund to utilities participating in the power transmission intertie between the Swan Lake and Tyee Lake hydroelectric projects for power projects, for repayment of loans, and for payments on bonds. * Sec. 2." Page 1, line 11, through page 2, line 2: Delete all material and insert: "(2) 60 percent of the balance in the four dam pool transfer fund shall be transferred to the general fund." Representative Brown moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. Representative Olberg objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HB 372 Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 7 NAYS: 32 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 1994-02-07 House Journal Page 2284 HB 372 Yeas: Brown, Carney, Davies, Finkelstein, Hoffman, Navarre, Nordlund Nays: Barnes, Brice, Bunde, B.Davis, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Grussendorf, Hanley, Hudson, James, Kott, Larson, Mackie, MacLean, Martin, Menard, Moses, Mulder, Nicholia, Olberg, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Sanders, Sitton, Therriault, Toohey, Ulmer, Vezey, Williams, Willis Excused: Davidson And so, Amendment No. 1 was not adopted. Representative Phillips moved and asked unanimous consent that HB 372 be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading and placed on final passage. Representative Ulmer objected and withdrew the objection. There being no further objection, it was so ordered. HB 372 was read the third time. The question being: "Shall HB 372 pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: HB 372 Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 37 NAYS: 2 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Barnes, Brice, Bunde, Carney, Davies, B.Davis, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Grussendorf, Hanley, Hoffman, Hudson, James, Kott, Larson, Mackie, MacLean, Martin, Menard, Moses, Mulder, Navarre, Nicholia, Nordlund, Olberg, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Sanders, Sitton, Therriault, Toohey, Ulmer, Vezey, Williams, Willis Nays: Brown, Finkelstein Excused: Davidson 1994-02-07 House Journal Page 2285 HB 372 And so, HB 372 passed the House and was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.